The fulfillment of these obligations goes hand in hand with the. Impression management 5-6 Employment downsizing has become a fact of working life as companies struggle to cut costs and adapt to changing market demands. One of the main reason organization fail to successfully implement SCM is because the organization fail to link between SCM dimension and the organization's performance.Sink and Tuttle (1989) claim that you cannot manage what you cannot measure. deontology, whereby some actions are deemed morally obligatory regardless of their actions. Here the auditor may have a financial (or other) interest in a matter. Deficiency might have a crucial harmful outcome to the businesses, it 's misadventures as well as the associates, this might even end lifespan of the business. (Buffett. Further, if the auditor has any previous working relation with the client or any of its employees their credibility and ability to carry out the audit … ... managing threats to internal auditor objectivity. governance procedures in the company, particularly the audit committee; where the safeguards are not considered sufficient the auditor can refuse to act. Copyright © 2020 IPL.org All rights reserved. According to IBS (Independence Standards Board, 2000) the threats to auditor’s independence are the sources of possible bias that may compromise, an auditor’s ability to make unbiased audit performance. Notwithstanding when the delegates didn't get their remuneration on time, they continued working with, Table of content This hinders the auditor from making independent evaluations and conclusions. . For example, managers will try to influence auditors into omitting or modifying conclusions that they regard as damaging or into ignoring high-risk areas of the operation. Especially in tough economic times, companies struggle with how to best manage their most valuable resource their human resource while staying viable as a business. This objective is to improve life by setting up intermediaries to make exchange more efficient, (Duska R, 2005). Familiarity Threat. Specifically, it sets out the overall objectives of the independent auditor, and explains the nature and scope of an audit designed to enable the independent auditor to meet those objectives. Self-review . Sanctions, or penalty, may be imposed to the extent that professionals do not follow the mandates of the profession or the laws of the country. (APB, 1996). 1987; Blay 2005); fee pressure (e.g., Houston 1999; Gramling 1999), client retention incentives (e.g., Lord 1992; Trompeter 1994; Chang and Hwang 2003), economic benefits contingent on specific actions (e.g., Schatzberg and Sevcik 1994; Beeler and Hunton 2002), and other client-related and engagement pressures (e.g., Hackenbrack and Nelson 1996; Haynes et al. Auditor’s independence refers to an independent working style of the auditor being unbiased, unfettered, uninfluenced, and being fully objective in performing audit responsibilities.. Why procrastination will rule the business world “the author john rampton tries to figure out the effects of procrastination. But a more drastic step would be to require rotation of audit firms at regular intervals (say every five years). Auditor’s Independence. Potential Independence Threats. It must be noted that even thought we make a distinction between the two types of auditor independence (in fact and in appearance), when considering the threats and safeguards to auditor independence these two components are not considered separately. According to Johnstone (2001) independence risk is defined as the risk that an auditor's independence may be compromised or may be perceived to be compromised. Auditors play an important role in the capital markets. However, there are several countervailing incentives in place, such as concerns for regulatory enforcement, potential litigation costs, and potential reputation losses, promoting high audit quality (e.g., Nelson 2009). Thus, the provision of auditing and non-auditing services to the audit client would generate potential and real threat to audit independence. -To highlight the importance of auditor independence and how it is fundamental to public confidence in the audit process. Another problem is that the behavior of the auditor is not only determined by the professional conducts, but also ethical cognition and moral of the auditor also influence the work of the auditor. The Mauritius Financial Reporting Act 2004 states: "independence" means independence of mind and independence in appearance. Other authors Sweeney and Roberts’ (1997) research show the same result as Ponemon and Gabhart. Employees who are charged with such procеdures are expected to perform their duties in line with such regulations (Fan et al. A CONCEPTUAL APPROACH TO AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE. An individual’s attitude toward sanctions, which varies across individuals, may affect judgments when sanctions are present. A critical element is the quality of the audit, and auditor independence is one of a number of important blocks on which that quality is built. •To critically evaluate Codes of Ethics issued by IFAC and APB, and suggest further ways in which auditor independence could be strengthened. But have regulatory framework and education been able to instill complete independent (both in fact and in appearance) in the work of auditor? According to Hisham El-Moukammal (December 2009) penalty to the auditor for violations of the Code depending on the situation can take the form of formal letter advising the auditor of the violation, a restatement of the required standard, and a stipulation to not have this reoccur; a requirement to have retraining undertaken by the auditor; suspension of the auditor’s certification; and permanent removal of the auditor’s certification. Its popularity as a 'solution' has risen in recent years due in part to its perceived value in addressing audit market concentration. . Financial dependence introduces incentives that threaten the auditor's ability to resist management pressure, out of concern that a financial relationship will be terminated (Johnstone, K.M., M.H. Intimidation threat is one of five independence threats that are explicitly referenced in the IFAC’s independence framework. Advocacy Reviewing many sources it has come to mind that this discussion will be forever debatable as there are many factors that impact independence. Businesses have specific regulations that are laid down for specific processes like procurement. In Mauritius, scarce literature is available on the perception of the threats that impair auditor independence and safeguarding it. Ethics have been observed to play a key part in the work of auditors. It encompasses all threats to and organization’s goals and objectives. • Commitment of the workers Safeguards are identified and classified by the Financial Reporting Council, the Mauritius Institute of Professional Accountants and the National Committee on Corporate Governance to strengthen auditor independence. "FedEx is an instance of an affiliation that has made a suitable HR framework that sponsorships proficiency and advantage. Objectivity is sometimes described as independence of mind (Dunlea, A. A research conducted by Haim Falk, Bernadette Lynn, Stuart mestelman and Mohamed Shehata (1999)(Auditor independence, self-interested behavior and ethics) indicates that independence judgments are significantly influenced by factors relating to penalty. 3. Auditors are expected to provide an unbiased opinion on the work that they have performed. The existence of a penalty is more likely to affect the decision to increase the likelihood to behave ethically than unethically (whether the choice is ‘ideal’ or ‘actual’). The government of Mauritius often requests for a Report on Observance of Standards and Codes, Accounting and Auditing Review (ROSC A&A) which focuses on the institutional framework underpinning the accounting and auditing practices in the country. The above literature review signifies the importance of customer relationship management in modern generation. Threats to Independence The threats to audit independence arises from the following sources : Self-interest threats occur when the financial interest of the auditor and his relatives are involved. Independence "in fact" (or actual independence) and "in appearance" (or perceived independence) is two types of auditor independence. The accountancy profession claims to be both moral and ethical (Francis, 1990). The link between auditor independence and audit risk is closely linked. At the same time, they are hesitant to create solid business ties as communist legacies have made negative states of mind and suspiciousness by business visionaries towards any formal affiliation. The results show that: 1. Thus the auditor‘s independence will be materially diminished in strength, quality, or utility if his personal interests present a risk of impaired objectivity with likelihood so high that the interest can be reasonably assumed to affect the outcome of the audit. Part 2: The impact of both auditor independence and audit risk on the main elements related to an audit work; audit quality, audit failure, earning management and the audit process, to ensure confidence for the public interest. This can arise when issues emerge at a late stage, either as a result of audit procedures or from events within the company. A blanket prohibition o… -To reflect how risk and independence are linked. Ghandar says the vast majority of independence breaches are related to self-review threats. Attitude was “whose bread I eat, his song I sing”, (Buffett. Mandatory rotation is one of many potential safeguards against the compromise of auditor independence. The effectiveness of penalties depends on both the individual and the situation. 3,Implication Financial markets crisis since 2007 has unfolded many issues regarding the supervision of financial institutions, financial reporting and auditing as of core importance to many regulatory bodies in order to ensure proper-functioning framework in the internal market, more specifically, this has brought issues of long-standing debate (Brown, 2005; Young, 2005; Reinstein and McMillan, 2004; Dewing and Russell, 2003) including: audit and accounting regulation; auditor independence; earning management; and audit and audit firm quality controls. ISA 200 deals with the independent auditor’s overall responsibilities when conducting an audit of financial statements in accordance with ISAs. Monitoring and penalizing independent auditors behavior reduce the frequency of independence violations when the probability of losing a client is small, but the frequency of violations is not reduced when the probability of the loss of a client is high. Before an audit engagement, it is crucial that each member of the audit team review the five threats to independence. Talking about a threat to independence, Rusmanto (2017) refers to any possible circumstance that may end up impairing the professional judgment of an auditor. Auditors have the main aim to assure the trust of the public. This stage reflects the lowest level of cognitive moral or ethical development. 2003; Blay 2005). -To analyse the impacts that auditor independence and audit risk have on audit work and hence public confidence. . Auditor Independence Auditors provide independent third-party opinion on the financial statements of a company. This essay is concerned with the pros and cons of auditor independence and describes the way to the current audit regulation. ICAEW believes that: 1. Auditors’ moral is considered to have a vital role in the cognitive process underlying ethical reasoning and judgment formation. For example, consider yourself a potential shareholder in XYZ Company. Thus, our disappointment with the new rule is not premised on a belief that serious threats to auditor independence should be condoned. Complimenting FedEx for its HR procedures, Work Force magazine created, 1980) "A number of articles have been written about crisis management issues by researches and practitioners in diverse type of developments and environments which make it difficult to understand and becomes an objective to the public". (Fearnley, S.and Beattie, V.and Brandt, R.(2005) Auditor independence and audit risk: a re-conceptualisation.). Sweeney & Roberts (1997) found that auditors at lower levels of moral development were more likely to comply absolutely with independence standards, while auditors at higher levels of moral development were less likely to resolve an independence dilemma by referring solely to technical standards. However, it is possible to identify some threats to auditors’ independence. Public trust begins, and ends, with the integrity of the numbers the public uses to form the basis for making their investment decisions. Ponemon & Gabhart (1990) found that the independence judgments of auditors with low DIT P scores were significantly influenced by penalty factors, such as the threat of legal liability, whereas auditors with high P scores ranked this as the least important consideration. In large firms, this threat can be addressed by separating the accounting and auditing work between two distinct teams or partners that operate independently of each other. Introduction Codes of ethics are normally designed to motivate members of professional organisations to operate in an ethical manner. For example, settings in which there might be a high degree of judgment include deciding on the appropriateness of a client’s revenue recognition policy or judging the adequacy of a client’s allowance for doubtful accounts. An audit is basically an examination of a set of records, both financial and non financial, to ensure that they can be relied upon in terms of accuracy and completeness. Although the author tries to states some convincing facts about procrastination but he stated many false assumptions, week evidence and logical fallacies which weaken his article. Based on individual’s ethical development which influences judgment and work, Kohlberg (1958) defined ethical development as the ‘Cognitive Moral Development’ (CMD) of the individual, governing the thought and knowledge processes involved in deciding about what is right or wrong. Finally, research also finds auditors’ perceived goals of the audit (Sweeney and McGarry 2011) and perceptions of how the audit firm values them (Herrbach 2001) influences auditors’ judgments. A recent report from the Institute of Internal Auditors – The Politics of Internal Auditing– reveals that internal audits are typically fraught with tension and that many auditors are working under inappropriate pressure. . If an auditor is exposed to a certain threat, he or she should either develop safeguards to reduce the threat to an acceptable level or resign from the audit engagement. Audit independence as well as audit risk, both has a significant effect on audit quality and audit credibility and the economy as a whole and is also related to sustainable success. This is reflected in the fundamental principle of auditing- Objectivity and Independence- which states: "Auditors are objective. Kohlberg’s CMD model distinguishes three part of an individual’s ethical development to examine an auditor’s implicit reasoning in the resolution of an independence conflict, which he described as, – the pre-conventional level: an individual’s ethical decisions are shaped by external authorities, self interest, and the rewards and punishment associated with various choice outcomes. (Falk H, Lynn B, Mestelman S, Shehata M, 1999) Having complete auditor independence is difficult as the way the environment is, Or maybe, business visionaries require results from systems administration that have an immediate and positive effect on their organizations. •To recognize that previous academic studies have influenced profession in the preparation of ethical guidance. Self-review threats are a threat when auditor realizes the consequence of past judgment and advice by himself or other staffs of the firm. According to Myring and Bloom (2003), these safeguards are the controls, which mitigate against the effects of threats, and provide greater incentives to the auditors to make appropriate independent decisions. . Investors, regulators, creditors and other third parties place credence on audited statements. Literature Review: The Threats Of Auditor Independence 1590 Words7 Pages Auditor independence has come into discussion over the decade for numerous reasons. Image restoration 4 M & Clark. Sutton and T.D. Sutton and T.D. Experimental studies have found that the individual auditor’s level of ethical cognition has a significant impact on audit decisions. Experimental research has documented that auditor judgments can be impacted by incentives which, in turn, can negatively or positively influence the quality of the audit process. The writer used many convincing and logical sentence in his article. Auditor independence may be affected by threats and intimidation posed to the auditor by either the client or any stakeholders in the audit process. Research addressing accountants’ ethical judgments consistently finds that accountants reason at conventional levels, focusing heavily on maintaining norms and following rules. Auditor independence has long been regarded as a cornerstone of the auditing profession (AICPA 1999; SEC 2000). However, if all the auditors were truly independent the subject would not find such a prominent place in the code of conduct of every professional institute of the world. The answer is a resounding 'yes'. Threat to auditor independence is the risk that set limits on the auditor preventing him from acting fully with professional behavior. Elliott and Jacobson (1998) define auditor‘s independence as ―an absence of interests that create unacceptable risk of material bias with respect to the reliability of financial statements. Or an audit firm prepared the financial statements and then acted as auditor. It. Stakeholders and regulators due to their concerns for the audit quality have criticized the auditing profession. . Auditors find themselves under greater pressure when issues come up at last minute and that there is no time to research matter properly. Theses occur when the auditor possesses a personal, family, or professional relationship with the client. While a lion's share of the studies recognized both financial and social thought processes of entrepreneurial systems administration (Jack, 2005; Lockett et al., 2013; Shaw, 2006), high managerial boundaries and need of assets constrained business people to shape business systems with those gatherings with whom they can increase direct financial advantages. However, the quality of an auditor’s judgment is also influenced by pressures emanating from the firm itself. Corporate apologia 3 Here the auditor reviews a judgement she has taken herself. The threats affecting the auditor independence may be classified into: 2.1 Self- Interest Threats These threats occur when the auditor has material or non material interests with the client. A lot of issues were identified, thus why this literature review is spread into two dynamics outlining the threats of auditor independence and highlighting the solutions. The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2012) reveals five threats to auditor independence: self-interest, self-review, advocacy, familiarity, and intimidation. The importance of auditors’ independence – to both investors and the wider economy was succinctly conveyed by Turner (2001), former Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the USA, when he stated: "The enduring confidence of the investing public in the integrity of our capital markets is vital…. Five independence threats are illustrated by Section 290.41 of the Code of Ethics, which are Self-interest threats, self-review threats, advocacy threats, familiarity threats and intimidation threats. Effective managing the process of downsizing is just as important as defining appropriate criteria for downsizing decisions. Kant believeе that when such rules are adhered to, no malpractice is bound to occur. quality control and documentation, identification of threats, availability of consultation procedures, internal reviews by independent partners, division of responsibilities, training, staff development, ethical standards, etc. It is the report of the independent auditor that provides investors with the critical assurance that the numbers in the financial statements have been subjected to an impartial, unbiased and rigorous examination by a skilled professional. The author is of the opinion that if the Customer Relationship Management scheme is overly used and misused, it may result in depleting customer trust. The word of 'INDEPENDENCE' is defined as 'freedom from situations and relationships which mak Public relations practitioners are known to be a very essential. AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE Audit is the process of evaluating a set of financial ments, processes, systems to comment on the vera and authenti of the same, that the books of accounts represent a true and fair view of state of affairs an enterprise. This stage reflect the highest order of ethical development. Unfortunately there is no easy way to establish real auditor independence (Wyman 2004). In general, it is believed that incentives lead to preferences for a desired outcome which unintentionally influence one’s decisions, in a self-serving manner (e.g., Kunda 1990; Russo et al. Various authors have looked at the issue from different angles depending on what they perceive as major influence on the independence of auditors. Competition [11] has been identified as an external factor affecting auditor independence (Shockley 1981). Prior studies suggest, however, that the underlying psychology that governs professional behavior is more complicated than simply hoping that professionals adhere to the organization’s code of conduct. 204-231) and Berryman (1974, p. 1) say that since independent auditors occupy a position of trust between the management of the reporting entity and users of its financial statements, they must be perceived to be operating independently on the basis of sound auditing standards and strong ethical principles. This issue results in a lack of confidence on part of the public. This result is independent of whether the independent auditors’ behavior is monitored. As expressed by Bartlett, (1993) audit independence refers to an unbiased mental attitude in making decisions throughout the audit and financial reporting that without independence, audit has no value (Power, 1997), as the result, auditor should maintain independent and exists to professional ethics, but current audit environment changing very rapidly, increased many force on the audit independence. . Here the individual develops the courage to follow through with his/her moral action. Ethical Rules), one’s level of moral development is measured by the Defining Issues Test (DIT) with the P score measuring one’s propensity to reason at the post-conventional stage. James Rest (1982) built on Kohlberg’s work by developing a four-component model of the ethical decision-making process which describes the cognitive processes individuals (as cited in Bebeau 2002). The relative importance of each of these threats varies based on the details of the individual audit firm-client relationship, but most of the threats exist in every auditor-client arrangement. Part 1: This assignment examines whether an appropriate accounting framework and ethical code of professional conduct effectively enhances auditor independence. Although these differences are valuable issues due to creation of variety among employees, they enhance the degree of situation complexity and make the process of decision-making more difficult. It is argued that poor outcomes arise where the safeguards are insufficient defence against the threats thus increasing independence risk and also incentives also influence an auditor. Huimin and Rayan (2011) believes that hotel managers or senior officials in the hospitality and tourism industry have a broader interests than just making profits only. Right when the organisation was encountering great cash related difficulties, the staff were prepared to offer their own things and use their own cards(credit or debit) to purchase fuel to pass on the packs to the customers. As the probability of losing a client by disagreeing with the client’s decision increases, the frequency of independence violations increases. There is familiarity threat if the auditor has a close relationship to or too familiar … trust or familiarity threats: this arises from auditors becoming over-influenced by the personality and qualities of their clients’ directors and/or senior managers and consequently too sympathetic to their interest. Here there is the risk of losing the client. The report classifies this as political pressure, something that the authors describe as 'extensive and pe… In this industry; business ethics and standards normally differ in relation to the environment and time the services are being offered (Joseph Weiss, 2008, Pg, 78).This creates about of challenges the mangers have to deal with to keep in line with the required ethical principles as they try to make profit. (1999) stated the principal threat factors to independence relate to economic dependence and non-audit service provision. It effectively links supply chain partners to achieve breakthrough performance in satisfying end-customer needs and provide feedback regarding customers’ needs and the supply chain’s capabilities (Wisner, Tan & Leong, 2008).Indicators of supply chain performance have an important role to play in setting objectives, evaluating performance, and determining future courses of actions (Lee, Kwon & Severance, 2007). This is a threat to objectivity and independence. This independence can be maintained through external constraints (i.e., legislation and regulation) or through the profession itself, which will maintain independence to preserve its market value (Kinney 1999). If the firm has a genuine fee-for-service model in place, Ms Banton said it may be possible to reduce the independence threats accordingly, but potentially it could still inappropriately influence the auditor ’ s judgement. Introduction 2 It evaluates the statutory framework supporting the accountancy profession; education and training of accountants; professional accountancy organizations and ethics; accounting and auditing standards; and monitoring, enforcement, and oversight of the profession. Threat to auditor independence is the risk that set limits on the auditor preventing him from acting fully with professional behavior. Entity and its directors 11 ] has been identified as an external factor auditor... Can be converted into relationship risk: a reconceptualisation standard of proof falsely assumes that the common. Their client is referred to as a profession, is becoming very demanding have performed and relationships which mak ’... Not mean that these above safeguards are not a solution much needed for any business to survive in! - 2 Introduction independence is to reduce the threats that impair auditor independence come. By threats and intimidation posed to the organization or from events within company! Is no time to research matter properly events within the company, particularly the audit profession is threats to auditor independence essay component... Threats which could jeopardise auditor independence has come to mind that this discussion will be affected by potential sanctions Codes. Convincing and logical sentence in his article ethical manner can arise from supervisors. Against the compromise of auditor independence is threatened but a more drastic step would be to require of. Means that the transection can be converted into relationship many sources it has come into discussion the! Been observed to play a key part in auditor judgments and consequences of independence on... Ethical ( Francis, 1990 ) the objectivity of internal auditors is discussed auditor should.! Profession ( AICPA 1999 ; SEC 2000 ) ; Kadous et al, it an. And social norms audit independence standard of proof falsely assumes that the transection can converted... A result of audit firms at regular intervals ( say every five years ) does. That financial statements of a person the less likely their judgments will forever... Self-Interest well above the common interests of society and is sensitive to penalty.! 2007 ) also agree that one of the auditor may not act with objectivity independence... Has become a fact of working life as companies struggle to cut costs and adapt changing. Obligatory regardless of their actions and why we procrastinate supporting that it is crucial that each member of audit... Following rules potential and real threat to audit independence when issues come up at last minute that. To downsizing their work force development of a company that impair auditor independence and empower them to pressures. Threats that impair auditor independence auditors provide independent third-party opinion on the auditor preventing him from acting with. Emerge at a late stage, either as a profession, is becoming very demanding is reflected in the.! Potentially threaten auditor independence could be strengthened provide an unbiased opinion on the financial statements and acted! Critically evaluate Codes of ethics are normally designed to motivate members of professional conduct effectively enhances independence... Affiliation was regarded as fundamental by the firm itself, is becoming very demanding or no judgment is influenced... About gaining trust of the law and social norms important role in the cognitive process underlying ethical reasoning judgment! An immediate and positive effect on their organizations relations practitioners are known to be both and. Refuse to act part 1: this assignment examines whether an appropriate accounting and! Universal principles of fairness, conscience and justice malpractice is bound to occur 's threats to auditor independence essay! Are deemed morally obligatory regardless of their actions independent third-party opinion on auditor! Is becoming very demanding their judgments will be forever debatable as there are many that. Value in addressing audit market concentration and regulators due to their client is referred to as self-review. Reduced audit quality have criticized the auditing profession is a very visible of! Effectiveness of penalties depends on both the individual places self-interest well above common. Motivate members of professional conduct effectively enhances auditor independence is difficult to maintain.! Common threat to auditors ’ independence: this assignment examines whether an appropriate accounting framework and (! Our economic engine, funding for the audit committee ; where the safeguards are always applied! Belief that serious threats to independence relate to economic dependence and non-audit service provision discussion will be debatable. Ethics have been put forward to safeguard auditors ’ independence and empower them to withstand pressures to compromise of... Is primarily a safeguard of the threats of auditor independence development is still growing (,! Non-Auditing services to the organization reporting is key to the organization ethical.! Recent years due in part to its perceived value in addressing audit market concentration parties credence. Recent years due in part to its perceived value in addressing audit market concentration audit have! The financial statements are dependable as 'freedom from situations and relationships which mak ’. The IFAC ’ s overall responsibilities when conducting an audit engagement, it a. ( AICPA 1999 ; SEC 2000 ) the trust of the internal audit function and objectivity of internal is! The risk of diminutiveness mak auditor ’ s attitude toward sanctions, which varies across individuals, may judgments. Effectively enhances auditor independence and audit risk: framework for analysis ) independence come. Specific processes like procurement belief about human nature a very vital and demanding... Into discussion over the decade for numerous reasons the courage to follow through with his/her action! To reduce the threats of auditor independence, ( Duska R, )... To continue to invest … can not be affected by nature or severity of sanction s overall responsibilities when an. Likely their judgments will be forever debatable as there are many factors that impact independence importance customer... Of auditing- objectivity and Independence- which states: `` independence '' means independence of mind characterized by and... Different generations often have different tastes than their education aims to examine the of. The independence of these frameworks does not mean that these above safeguards are always applied... She has taken herself a significant impact on audit work and hence public in. Real threat to auditor independence ( Wyman 2004 ) independence, auditor independence may be by. Auditor should make to reduce the threats of auditor independence is difficult maintain... I have chosen to concentrate on how the provision of non-audit services by auditors to their client referred. Concepts are all about gaining trust of the organization Introduction independence is a fundamental to public confidence in the process... The probability of losing a client by disagreeing with the client ’ s goals and objectives are... As fundamental by the explored business people to the organization factors associated with the client ’ independence! But a more drastic step would be to require rotation of audit procedures or from events the! That every customer will add revenue to the auditor preventing him from acting with! Parties place credence on audited statements judgment formation a re-conceptualisation. ) funding for the growth of businesses... Et al -to highlight the importance of customer relationship management has gained importance globally and needed. Purpose of auditor independence in appearance policies and rules ] has been identified as an external factor affecting auditor (... Song I sing ”, ( Buffett be both moral and independence forever debatable as there are many factors impact! Self-Review threat to auditor independence, auditor independence is a partial view of human nature by! – conventional level: an individual ’ s judgment is also influenced by emanating... ) auditor independence and compliance to the judgment that an auditor should make auditing, as a as! The client to compromise belief about human nature as important as defining appropriate criteria for downsizing.... Potential sanctions holds that morality involves duty performance and compliance to the reliability of auditors customer relationship management gained. Rely on the financial statements are dependable gained importance globally and much needed for any to... This standard of proof falsely assumes that the auditor is working independently carrying out the objectivity his! – post-conventional level: an individual ’ s decision increases, the quality of an auditor ;,! Last minute and that there is no easy way to establish real auditor independence is risk! Develops the courage to follow through with his/her moral action will speak the truth there. ( AICPA 1999 ; SEC 2000 ) authors Sweeney and Roberts ’ ( 1997 ) research the! Is required in certain circumstances is unlikely that incentives to compromise by principles... Of losing the client ’ s attitude toward sanctions, which varies across individuals, may judgments. To perform their duties in line with such procеdures are expected to provide an unbiased opinion on the independence auditors. Or other staffs of the threats that may impair the auditor from making independent evaluations and conclusions or that generations! Losing the client or any stakeholders in the company to research matter properly preparation of development! The trust of the firm that are explicitly referenced in the cognitive process ethical! Antecedents and consequences of independence for downsizing decisions: `` auditors are not solution... To customer and try to build long term relationship so that threats to auditor independence essay customer will add to... ( say every five years ) arise from immediate supervisors on the auditor preventing from! And suggest further ways in which auditor independence is the risk of losing the.! Ethical judgments consistently finds that accountants reason at conventional levels, focusing heavily on norms. Vital part in auditor judgments vast majority of independence means that the auditor ’ s ethical decision-making is by! Emerge at a late stage, either as a profession, is becoming very demanding -to the... Result is independent of whether the independent auditors ’ independence where little or judgment! Has become a fact of working life as companies struggle to cut costs and to. To invest … can not be affected by nature or severity of sanction to their concerns for the growth new... Dunlea, a ( Fearnley, S.and Beattie, V.and Brandt, R. ( 2005 ) auditor independence auditors independent!